The Living Lattice™ is currently in the early stage of formal scientific review.

Our goal is simple: independent replication.  We invite qualified scientists, analysts, and engineers to evaluate the model’s structure, assumptions, and predictive accuracy using open data.

​

The work has been submitted to five leading universities in the Philadelphia region, formally requesting scientific validation of the framework I call The Living Lattice™. I have submitted documentation, examples, and small-scale reproducible tests so that anyone with curiosity and rigor can begin to explore what I’ve described.

 

During its initial development the framework was applied to limited datasets—financial, environmental, and behavioral—to explore whether a single equation could map probability, possibility, and energy within one field.  The preliminary signals were encouraging: patterns appeared that were measurably better than random chance.

 

Now the next step is to verify these results through controlled testing.

We are seeking reviewers who can:

 

1. Re-run the baseline calculations on public datasets.

2. Design fresh experiments that test the model’s generality.

3. Compare lattice-based predictions with existing statistical or physical models.

4. Provide written observations—whether supportive or critical—for transparent publication on this page.

 

 

All validation work will remain independent, transparent, and open to replication.

A downloadable packet will be posted here containing:

 

• A brief description of the core equations and terms.

• Instructions for running small reproducible tests.

• A data template for submitting independent results.

 

 

The goal is not to prove the theory correct in every detail but to determine where it aligns with known science, where it diverges, and how it may be refined.